23 posts tagged “books”
I read a lot of books, but then I go through these lists and realise how many I haven't read... I need to get reading!
Taken from writebrained
1) Look at the list and bold those you have read.
2) Italicize those you intend to read
3) Underline the books you LOVE.
4) Reprint this list in your own weblog / journal so we can try and track down
these people who’ve read 6 and force books upon them.
- Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen
- Lord of the Rings - JRR Tolkien
- Jane Eyre - Charlotte Bronte
- Harry Potter Series - JK Rowling
- To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee
- The Bible
- Wuthering Heights - Emily Bronte
- Nineteen Eighty Four - George Orwell
- His Dark Materials - Phillip Pullman
- Great Expectations - Charles Dickens
- Little Women - Louisa M Alcott
- Tess of the D'Urbervilles - Thomas Hardy
- Catch 22 - Joseph Heller
- Complete Works of William Shakespeare
- Rebecca - Daphne Du Maurier
- The Hobbit - JRR Tolkien
- Birdsong - Sebastian Faulks
- Catcher in the Rye - JD Salinger
- The Time Traveller's Wife - Audrey Niffenegger
- Middlemarch - George Eliot
- Gone with the Wind - Margaret Mitchell
- The Great Gatsby - F Scott Fitzgerald
- Great Expectations - Charles Dickens
- War and Peace - Leo Tolstoy
- The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams
- Brideshead Revisited - Evelyn Waugh
- Crime and Punishment - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
- Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck
- Alice in Wonderland - Lewis Carroll
- The Wind in the Willows - Kenneth Grahame
- Anna Karenina - Leo Tolstoy
- David Copperfield - Charles Dickens
- Chronicles of Narnia - CS Lewis
- Emma - Jane Austen
- Persuasion - Jane Austen
- The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe - CS Lewis
- The Kite Runner - Khaled Hosseini
- Captain Corelli's Mandolin - Louis De Bernieres
- Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden
- Winnie the Pooh - AA Milne
- Animal Farm - George Orwell
- The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown
- One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez
- A Prayer for Owen Meany - John Irving
- The Woman in White - Wilkie Collins
- Anne of Green Gables - LM Montgomery
- Far From The Madding Crowd - Thomas Hardy
- The Handmaid's Tale - Margaret Attwood
- Lord of the Flies - William Golding
- Atonement - Ian McEwan
- Life of Pi - Yann Martel
- Dune - Frank Herbert
- Cold Comfort Farm - Stella Gibbons
- Sense and Sensibility - Jane Austen
- A Suitable Boy - Vikram Seth
- The Shadow of the Wind - Carlos Ruiz Zafon
- A Tale of Two Cities - Charles Dickens
- Brave New World - Aldous Huxley
- The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time - Mark Haddon
- Love in the Time of Cholera - Gabriel Garcia Marquez
- Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck
- Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov
- The Secret History - Donna Tartt
- The Lovely Bones - Alice Sebold
- Count of Monte Cristo - Alexandre Dumas
- On The Road - Jack Kerouac
- Jude the Obscure - Thomas Hardy
- Bridget Jones' Diary - Helen Fielding
- Midnight's Children - Salman Rushdie
- Moby Dick - Herman Melville
- Oliver Twist - Charles Dickens
- Dracula - Bram Stoker
- The Secret Garden - Frances Hodgson Burnett
- Notes From a Small Island - Bill Bryson
- Ulysses - James Joyce
- The Bell Jar - Sylvia Plath
- Swallows and Amazons - Arthur Ranson
- Germinal - Emile Zola
- Vanity Fair - William Makepeace Thackeray
- Possession - AS Byatt
- A Christmas Carol - Charles Dickens
- Cloud Atlas - David Mitchell
- The Colour Purple - Alice Walker
- The Remains of the Day - Kazuo Ishigury
- Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert
- A Fine Balance - Rohinton Mistry
- Charlotte's Web - EB White
- The Five People You Meet in Heaven - Mitch Albom
- Adventures of Sherlock Holmes - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
- The Faraway Tree Collection - Enid Blyton
- Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad
- The Little Prince - Antoine De Saint-Exupery
- The Wasp Factory - Iain Banks
- Watership Down - Richard Adams
- A Confederacy of Dunces - John Kennedy Toole
- A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute
- The Three Musketeers - Alexandre Dumas
- Hamlet - William Shakespeare
- Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - Roald Dahl
- Les Miserables - Victor Hugo
48/100 I fail :P
Azar Nafisi
I'm probably one of the last people to read this book, but I just have to comment that I really enjoyed it. Iran is so villainized by the west (well, America at least) that you rarely here about the actual people inside the country. That has always been a problem with America though, I feel. Just from news and the way people talk, it is as if most of the population forget that there are actual human beings inside other countries. Compassion isn't one of America's biggest exports though.
Anyway, this book was so intelligent! It was well written and, though it was composed of what seemed somewhat like random stories that spanned over the 18 years she spent in Iran, it still felt cohesive. The stories were emotional, interesting, or insightful. Perhaps I don't read a lot of memoirs, but I really enjoyed hearing everything from her perspective. The pieces of life that she knew about about the girls that she taught, and the pieces of their lives that are veiled from our eyes as much as they were veiled to hers. Their personalities without always knowing what made them that way or what they were thinking, guessing from their glances and silent emotions. I enjoyed reading her thoughts on the world she saw from where she was and not inventing pieces of the stories that didn't exist for her.
Plus, the parts about the books tied in beautifully to the story and I felt like I learned so much about the books from reading this one. And a better understanding of her experiences from what she detailed about the books and what I already knew about them. It I felt like I learned so much just by reading it. About the people in Iran, about their history/revolution, and about the books that they read. It was really a fascinating book. One of the most interestingly intelligent ones I've read.
I highly recommend it. It isn't necessary to have read all the books they talk about, though having read them would help you comprehend the story a bit better, I felt like she described them well enough to not make it imperative that you have read them before. Maybe not, I had read most of them, so I may be a little off in that guess, but I think it is still worth a read. If anything, it'll make you want to read the books mentioned if you haven't already!
A+
Book # 7
May 2
Book Title: Saints and Villains
Author: Denise Giardina
Genre: Historical Fiction
# of pages: 481
My rating of the book, F- [worst] to A
[best].: A
Short description/summary of the book:
[Amazon]
Sometimes the universe produces a man or woman whose life seems ready-made for fiction: Joan of Arc, for example, or Robert Falcon Scott; John Brown, Martin Luther King Jr., or Jesus of Nazareth. Fiction writers are attracted to larger-than-life personalities and each of the above-mentioned luminaries have indeed appeared in fictional works. Now German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer joins their ranks in Denise Giardina's novel Saints and Sinners. Bonhoeffer was born in 1906 in Breslau, Germany. As a young man, he found his vocation in the church, and his theological education took him to England, Spain, and eventually New York, where he spent a year in post-doctoral studies at Union Theological Seminary. He returned to Germany imbued with both the ideals of ecumenicalism and of the Church's responsibility to participate in social and political debate. These ideals, unfortunately, were hardly compatible with the rise of Nazism in the Germany of the '30s and '40s. Bonnhoeffer, true to his beliefs, spoke out against the Nazi regime, and participated in Germany's small Protestant resistance. He was eventually arrested for helping Jews escape to Switzerland and was hanged in the concentration camp in Flossenberg in the waning days of the war.
Denise Giardina knows the stuff of drama when she sees it, and in writing this fictionalized account of Bonhoeffer's life and death, she has drawn heavily on his own writings. Though she sticks to the facts where chronology is concerned, she does introduce three fictional characters into her protagonist's life as a means of illuminating his most private aspects. There is Elisabeth Hildebrant, Bonhoeffer's Jewish lover; Alois Bauer, his Nazi nemesis; and Fred Bishop, a black American seminarian Bonhoeffer meets during his year in New York who serves to politicize and radicalize the German theologian.
My Thoughts:
I really enjoyed this book (Why do I keep saying that? I enjoy all the books I read). I haven’t read many books about WWII, but I found it fascinating. This one was very interesting, the conspiracies, characters, spiritual dilemmas. All really interesting. It definitely does a good job to remind you that not all people are their government, does that make sense? Drives me crazy when people think that. I think the portrayal of the stormtrooper (doppelganger) was very humanizing as well, which made it more interesting since he was a little less predictable (but sometimes predictable in his unpredictableness).
I agree with a review that I read on Amazon, Bonhoeffer doesn’t really embody a hero. He seems almost weak and pathetic and really, though maybe he has the convictions to do what he wants, doesn’t really seem to play a big role in the whole ordeal of attempting to assassinate Hitler. I personally thinks it makes for an interesting story though. Sometimes it is better to read about real people, their thoughts, doubts, motivations, shortcomings, than supernatural heroes.Book # 8
May 11
Book Title: The Lovely Bones
Author: Alice Sebold
Genre: Sci-Fiction
# of pages: 328
My rating of the book, F- [worst] to A [best].: A
Short description/summary of the book: [Amazon]
When we first meet Susie Salmon, she is already in heaven. As she looks down from this strange new place, she tells us, in the fresh and spirited voice of a fourteen-year-old girl, a tale that is both haunting and full of hope. In the weeks following her death, Susie watches life on Earth continuing without her-her school friends trading rumors about her disappearance, her family holding out hope that she'll be found, her killer trying to cover his tracks. As months pass without leads, Susie sees her parents' marriage being contorted by loss, her sister hardening herself in an effort to stay strong, and her little brother trying to grasp the meaning of the word gone. And she explores the place called heaven. It looks a lot like her school playground, with the good kind of swing sets. There are counselors to help newcomers adjust and friends to room with. Everything she ever wanted appears as soon as she thinks of it-except the thing she most wants: to be back with the people she loved on Earth. With compassion, longing, and a growing understanding, Susie sees her loved ones pass through grief and begin to mend. Her father embarks on a risky quest to ensnare her killer. Her sister undertakes a feat of remarkable daring. And the boy Susie cared for moves on, only to find himself at the center of a miraculous event. The Lovely Bones is luminous and astonishing, a novel that builds out of grief the most hopeful of stories. In the hands of a brilliant new writer, this story of the worst thing a family can face is transformed into a suspenseful and even funny novel about love, memory, joy, heaven, and healing.
My Thoughts:
This was really interesting! Definitely reminded me of ‘Saving Fish from Drowning’, but only because of the perspective of a dead person watching the living. I thought this book was really interesting! It was interesting to see the different ways people coped with death, people who it affected more than you thought it would (someone she barely knew in life becoming one of her main connections to the ‘world of the living’). And the version of heaven that Sebold came up with was really interesting. I tried to explain it to someone, but it is sort of impossible to explain.
Of course, now that I read it, I really don’t have
the vaguest idea how it is going to be turned into a movie.
Currently reading :
Love in the Time of Cholera
Each year I start a list of books in a word file. I fell behind posting them last year, but I won't weigh you down with all of them. Needless to say, I was disappointed in the amount I read because of school taking over my life. Hopefully that won't happen this year (I did have a better head start at the beginning of last year before heading back into school though...) Anyway, a book I finished a few days ago...
Book # 1
Book Title: Alexandra : The Last Tsarina [Buy Here]
Author: Carolly Erickson
Genre: Historical, biographical, non-fiction
# of pages: 335
My rating of the book, F- [worst] to A [best].: A
Short description/summary of the book: Erickson is the author of
many popular historical biographies, only one of which (Great Catherine) dealt
with Russia. When the German princess Alexandra of Hesse-Darmstadt (1872-1918)
married the heir to the Russian throne in 1894, she assumed a role for which
she was not suited, by temperament or by upbringing, as well as an obligation
to support her clearly weaker husband. The author depicts her subject as
rejected from the start by the Russian court and oblivious to the political
situation in her adopted country, with a strong desire for a
"normal," loving family life. As a result, Alexandra gradually
withdrew into the mystic tradition of Russian Orthodoxy, and her illnesses
isolated her ever further from the troubles abroad in Russia. The book quotes
extensively from Alexandra's letters and from memoirs left by her friends and
contemporaries.
My Thoughts:
I thought the book was fantastic. I’ve had a few experiences with reading bland biographies. The author does a great job making this accessible and readable. It felt like reading a novel rather than a biography. She did a fantastic amount of research but also brought real emotion into the characters. I thought it was great, I’ve never even had a huge interest in tsarist Russia, but I could definitely get into it if there are more books were this interesting! If I had to list a downside it was that it was a little overly melodramatic, but as far as I know, that is how they all are because that is how these people were. It made you overly sympathetic with the Tsarina and her family, but I felt it was more like reading a personal diary (emotion and circumstance wise) and wasn’t really meant to focus on the whole big picture, you have to do more research to figure all that out. It was more ‘through her eyes’ and in that sense I felt it was okay to occasionally be melodramatic or biased and not focus on analyzing her actions. That is my argument against some of the reviews about the book I read on Amazon. My greenness in the area could be affecting my opinion though, be forewarned. Definitely made learning some history enjoyable. Definitely recommended, if you can get past the weirdness and general incompetence of most royal families, lol. I plan on reading more about the Romanovs, I’ve developed an interesting in Russian history (which is why I picked up this book in the first place). Perhaps I’ll read more throughout the year and possibly re-evaluate this one.
[Buy Here]Currently reading : She H. Rider Haggard
My Amazon store
Book # 23
Book Title: Saving Fish from Drowning
Author: Amy Tan
Genre: Fiction
# of pages: 474
My rating of the book, F- [worst] to A [best].: B-
Short description/summary of the book: [from Amazon]
The title of the book is derived from the practice of Myanmar fishermen who "scoop up the fish and bring them to shore. They say they are saving the fish from drowning. Unfortunately... the fish do not recover," This kind of magical thinking or hypocrisy or mystical attitude or sheer stupidity is a fair metaphor for the entire book. It may be read as a satire, a political statement, a picaresque tale with several "picaros" or simply a story about a tour gone wrong.
Bibi Chen, San Francisco socialite and art vendor to the stars, plans to lead a trip for 12 friends: "My friends, those lovers of art, most of them rich, intelligent, and spoiled, would spend a week in China and arrive in Burma on Christmas Day." Unfortunately, Bibi dies, in very strange circumstances, before the tour begins. After wrangling about it, the group decides to go after all. The leader they choose is indecisive and epileptic, a dangerous combo. Bibi goes along as the disembodied voice-over.
Once in Myanmar, finally, they are noticed by a group of Karen tribesmen who decide that Rupert, the 15-year-old son of a bamboo grower is, in fact, Younger White Brother, or The Lord of the Nats. He can do card tricks and is carrying a Stephen King paperback. These are adjudged to be signs of his deity and ability to save them from marauding soldiers. The group is "kidnapped," although they think they are setting out for a Christmas Day surprise, and taken deep into the jungle where they languish, develop malaria, learn to eat slimy things and wait to be rescued. Nats are "believed to be the spirits of nature--the lake, the trees, the mountains, the snakes and birds. They were numberless ... They were everywhere, as were bad luck and the need to find reasons for it." Philosophy or cynicism? This elusive point of view is found throughout the novel--a bald statement is made and then Tan pulls her punches as if she is unwilling to make a statement that might set a more serious tone.
There are some goofy parts about Harry, the member of the group who is left behind, and his encounter with two newswomen from Global News Network, some slapstick sex scenes and a great deal of dog-loving dialogue. These all contribute to a novel that is silly but not really funny, could have an occasionally serious theme which suddenly disappears, and is about a group of stereotypical characters that it's hard to care about.
My Thoughts:
Would you believe that this is my first Amy Tan book? I never thought her books even sounded interesting (mother daughter relationship in a Chinese-American family? -_-), but this one sounded great and interesting and was, all in all, an enjoyable read. Thanks for the book Lady Jane!
Hard to say what I thought about this book. It held more weight when I thought it was based on a true story, however, reading through an interview, she said that the Note to the Reader at the beginning was, alas, fictional. It starts off somber, with the funeral of the dead narrator, which continues to inject a dark humour into the book. When I was reading it, the story line was going along, but there was always this foreboding, even when nothing was really going wrong, since you knew something was going to happen, and also, when the omnipotent narrator would often say ‘If only they knew what was going to happen.’ All this darkness overshadowing the entire story, storm clouds waiting to burst, expect the worst. And it brought back a very unsettling feeling of the idea of going somewhere on an innocent vacation and having something happen and never coming back (a distinctly real worry my stay in China invoked in me). When thinking back, perhaps this feeling the book tried to bring about was just a little too strong, maybe she pushed it a little too much, because, in the end, it didn’t really seem to amount to much. The characters, who were at first interesting, sort of became static. It was interesting, when their journey started, to see how they interacted with each other, a common feeling of being put into situations were you become ‘family’ to people you don’t really know. It was interesting to get into the minds of the characters through the narrator, though somewhat bizarre. I really did enjoy the descriptions of the travel and the country (and the parts of China that I had been too!), but the expectations I had at the beginning of the book for darkness and mystery and despair were unfulfilled. The darkness was, at best, dark humour, which was usually out of place; the mystery was, really, no mystery at all; the situation they found themselves in was, really, not that bad (not enough for all the damning comments and all those, ‘Dun dun DUUUNNN’ moments, I could almost hear that in my head) and the emotions seemed 2 dimensional. You had a hard time, at the end, identifying with the situation and the characters, it just stopped seeming real.
So, all this dark and foreboding and, in the end, (hope I don’t spoil anyone), everything turned out fine, no one died, was hurt, had a bad experience, and everyone lived happily ever after.
I don’t know if I would be as damning as the reviews on Amazon, I really did enjoy this book and some of the characters while reading it, but it sort of fell apart at the end.
It did,
however, remind me what I always disliked about those tourist groups we would
run across, damn Americans, lol.
Currently reading : School books :P Machiavelli, textbooks, etc.
~Nikki
(Amazon Store
Book # 22
Book Title: Watership Down
Author: Richard Adams
Genre: Fiction
# of pages: 475
My rating of the book, F- [worst] to A [best].: A+++
Short description/summary of the book: (Amazon)
The story is about a band of rabbits---Hazel, Bigwig, Fiver, Dandelion, and Bluebell---who set off from their comfy holes to find a new rabbit warren on the plains of Watership Down. They leave their original warren because Fiver (a small, brooding rabbit with 'The Sight') has a vision of it being destroyed. Not surprisingly, soon after they leave, they find out that the warren HAD been destroyed by big hrududil (tractors) that dug up the ground and killed all those who remained behind.
The trials and tribulations of Hazel and his band of rogue rabbits carries the story along at a leisurely pace, not rushing to get the story out, giving rabbit history and mythology a few well-deserved pages, too.
After Hazel and his fellow bunnies set up their new warren on Watership Down, though, they find that they have a serious problem: no does (females)! Without does, their new warren is doomed to failure, so they set about trying to locate some breeding stock. But what they encounter is a terrible warren known as Efrafa run by the overbearing and callous General Woundwort. The battle between Watership Down and Efrafa is terrible and exciting reading, even for adults.
My Thoughts:
I hadn’t read this book in, it has to be about 10 years. It was my favourite book for AGES and I finally decided that it was time to read it again. The name had popped up recently (a few times) and I just couldn’t resist. I RARELY reread books. Very, very rarely. But I have to say, either this book is just that amazing, or it was so long ago I don’t really remember it well enough, but I never got tired of it. And thing is, I did remember it while I was rereading it and it still never got old or boring. I loved it just as much as the first time on a totally different level. It was really interesting to read it now, with all the knowledge and life lessons I have gained in the ten years since reading it the first time. Even though it is about talking rabbits, I would never consider this a children's book. The themes and adventures can be slightly disturbing at times (yet unobtrusively), and it really has a depth that you would never think this type of book could contain. I adore it. It is back (and will never fall off again) of my favourite book of all times list.
Currently reading : Saving Fish from Drowning, Amy Tan
Book # 20
Book Title: Phantastes : A Faerie Romance
Author: George McDonald
Genre: Fantasy
# of pages: 320
My rating of the book, F- [worst] to A [best].: B
Short description/summary of the book: Amazon.com (from people always more eloquent than
myself)
This is an enchanting work of high fantasy, lyrical in its composition, spiritual in its nature, and enlightening in its effect on the careful reader. As the subtitle says, Phantastes is a Faerie Romance For Men and Women. The Fairy Land in which Anodos, the narrator, ventures is not the fairy land of youth's innocent dreams; rather, it is an otherworldly plane full of great beauty and terrible ugliness, impish little fairies and horrible, teasing goblins, nurturing spirits and malevolent entities. Anodos' discovery of a fairy inside his deceased father's old desk leads to his unplanned journey into this world of wonder. Interestingly, upon entering Fairy Land, Anodos leaves the beaten path and makes his way through the woods all on his own. He meets a diverse cast of characters along the way, reckoning with dark beings who threaten his spiritual well-being while also finding great and needed comfort at crucial times from nurturing maternal forces. His own shadow takes on perhaps the most malevolent influence of all the beings he deals with. He often finds himself compelled to sing, and his songs are powerful enough to free a beautiful White Lady from inside a statue; he remains infatuated with this lady for a long time, trying desperately to find her; his love for her, he comes to realize, comes in large part from his feelings of having been the one to free her, and an important point the author seems to be suggesting is that the love of a giver is much more pure than the love of a benefactor.
Much of this story is allegorical; Anodos basically comes to know himself and to see the world more objectively as a result of his journeys. He often resorts to tears, yet he also raises his voice in song to uplift others. He discovers the power of brotherly love and the beauty that is all around, yet he cringes at the sight of the shadowy creatures that would do him ill. His journey is challenging because he naturally falls prey to feelings of pride and egotism, but his losses and sorrows eventually coalesce themselves into something of beauty, for it is these experiences that help him grow more spiritual. Much has been made of MacDonald's religious beliefs, but Phantastes to me calls forth no religion other than spiritualism and personal growth and maturity. Good and evil do not exist in Fairy Land, except in the sense that there is both good and evil in each individual spirit.
Doubtless, some will not like MacDonald's 19th-century, florid style. There is action in this novel, but it definitely takes a back seat to exposition and philosophical musings. Some will surely find Phantastes exceptionally boring, but those readers willing to follow Anodos deeply into Fairy Land will embark on an enlightening, touching read that will almost surely make them better persons for having taken the literary journey.
My Thoughts:
A really
fantastic book. If you like Tolkien or
CS Lewis, I have no doubt that you will enjoy this book. It has an older feeling than a lot of the
fantasies today, it doesn’t try and be something it is not, it really goes back
to the heart of the fantasy genre. It
isn’t by any means predictable or corny though. It is the story of Anodos, fallen into a faery land and wandering
around without an aim. Adventures that
he has, creatures that he sees, his own shadow that plagues him, and the search
for something that he isn’t aware of yet.
There is a very strong bitter-sweet feeling to the book, it isn’t your
childhood waltz through magical land, more of an allegorical soul-searching
journey through the awesomely beautiful and terrifyingly dark.
Quote :
Afterwards I learned, that the best way to manage some kinds of painful thoughts, is to dare them to do their worst, to let them lie and gnaw at your heart till they are tired; and you find you still have a residue of life they cannot kill.
Book # 19
Book Title: The Time Traveler’s Wife
Author: Audrey Niffenegger
Genre: Fiction/Modern
# of pages: 536
My rating of the book, F- [worst] to A [best].: A
Short description/summary of the book:
From Publishers Weekly
This highly original first novel won the largest advance San Francisco-based
MacAdam/Cage had ever paid, and it was money well spent. Niffenegger has
written a soaring love story illuminated by dozens of finely observed details
and scenes, and one that skates nimbly around a huge conundrum at the heart of
the book: Henry De Tamble, a rather dashing librarian at the famous Newberry
Library in Chicago, finds himself unavoidably whisked around in time. He
disappears from a scene in, say, 1998 to find himself suddenly, usually without
his clothes, which mysteriously disappear in transit, at an entirely different
place 10 years earlier-or later. During one of these migrations, he drops in on
beautiful teenage Clare Abshire, an heiress in a large house on the nearby
Michigan peninsula, and a lifelong passion is born. The problem is that while
Henry's age darts back and forth according to his location in time, Clare's
moves forward in the normal manner, so the pair are often out of sync. But such
is the author's tenderness with the characters, and the determinedly ungimmicky
way in which she writes of their predicament [...] that the book is much more
love story than fantasy. It also has a splendidly drawn cast, from Henry's
violinist father [...] to Clare's odd family and a multitude of Chicago
bohemian friends. [...] It is a fair tribute to her skill and sensibility to
say that the book leaves a reader with an impression of life's riches and
strangeness rather than of easy thrills.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.
My Thoughts:
I know I’m a little behind on the times and it’s shocking that someone hasn’t read this book…
I don’t read a lot of modern fiction, so I’m always a little surprised at the way it is written. It’s always so easy to get through and the people and situations and conversations seem so familiar and real.
The time traveling was really interesting. Unlike many references to time-traveling, you don’t sit there wondering how it is possible, or pondering all the different theories of alternate planes and whatnot (at least I didn’t). It wasn’t too hard to wrap your head around the jumping time zones once you realised that most of it was chronologically through Clare’s life, and it was always interesting to piece together what was happening to him later in his life when he would visit when she was younger.
I really got attached to the characters and seeing as how this turns into one of the more depressing books I’ve read, I’ll admit, I was crying at the end.
I’ll also admit that I am a snob, especially a book snob, so when I decided to read this (it was recommended to me by a few people) I was kind of embarrassed to be seen with it. I have issues with reading books that are popular….they are usually pretty dumb (to appeal to the masses), but I have to say, that I really enjoyed the premise of this book. I can see why it would be popular, the writing style is so smooth and easy, probably because it is modern fiction, but like I said, I’m not used to reading that. But I’m definitely glad I wasn’t embarrassed enough to not read it at all, I really enjoyed this book.
From what I gather though, it is a hit or miss with people, but it is worth picking up to see if you like it.
18 is a pathetic number isn't it? I just haven't been in a reading mood I guess. Well, in an attempt to keep myself from watching Lois & Clark DVDs for a third time in one month, I made myself pick up a book. Unfortunately I hate reading more than one book a day, which left me with quite a lot of extra time on my hands when I was done with this one since I'm a pretty speedy reader.
Book # 18
Book Title: A Venetian Affair
[A True Tale of Forbidden Love in the 18th Century]
Author: Andrea Di Robilant
Genre: Non-Fiction
# of pages: 291
My rating of the book, F- [worst] to A [best].: A
Short description/summary of the book:
[Amazon]
It's hard to imagine a more romantic real-life story than
the long, forbidden love affair of the 18th-century Venetian nobleman Andrea
Memmo and a half-English beauty named Giustiniana Wynne. Andrea Di Robilant's A
Venetian Affair is drawn in part from a cache of letters discovered by the
author's father in his ancestral palazzo on the Grand Canal. In 1753,
his ancestor Andrea Memmo had been introduced to a lovely girl of uncertain
station (illegitimate, although her parents later married). The Wynnes's position
was precarious enough in Venice's rigid society, and Giustiniana's mother took
every step to prevent the young aristocrat from corrupting her daughter. But
the two lovers began to meet in secret: exchanging letters through confederates
and communicating in public through an elaborate code of nods and gestures.
They even came within a few days of being married before further dark
revelations about Giustiniana's family put a permanent end to their hopes.
Although Memmo went on to have an illustrious career in the dying Venetian
Republic, it is Giustiniana's astonishing later life that really captures the
reader. A Venetian Affair provides both a rich picture of the
times--including cameo appearances by that scamp, Casanova--and a convincing
account of an enduring passion.
My Thoughts:
I was surprised that the book was so interesting. It surely sounded interesting, but with a non-fiction written from letters and not completely in novel form, it had the potential to be very dry. But it most definitely wasn’t. It went seamlessly between story, letter, historical information and background. It was very informative and really a fun read. I like the passion between the two lovers and how different it was from what would go on today, anyone as clingy as Giustiniana nowadays would never go over well. It was very romantic though, and their constant correspondence and the slow change in their relationship really made you wonder how everything was going to turn out. I’ve always loved hearing about Venice during that time period and I especially liked the circles that the two of them moved in, hearing familiar names like Casanova (a friend to both of them) was somewhat thrilling and really made me want to read a book about him.
I was disappointed with the ending, but not enough to not like the book. It was unclear how things actually ended because correspondence between them hasn’t been found during that time period, but you could tell earlier on that their relationship had faded. And the epilogue about what happened to both of them was mildly depressing. I very much preferred the beginning of their story with the passions and intrigues, but isn’t that always the way with love? It lets you know that it was real.
So, synopsis, the writing style was definitely interesting, but didn’t detract, I rather liked it for a non-fiction book. It reminded you that it was all a true story, which made the whole thing even more fascinating. Better than historical fiction ;)
Sure, it may be a religious discussion, but when looking at the way this country is currently being run, I think it is a perfectly acceptable discussion for debates. When religious views take over common sense when you are running a country, I think that is a good enough reason to be worried.
Perhaps they are just playing to the large voter base of religious fanatics, but either way, it is worrisome. I can't help but think, as long as they don't believe in things like evolution, that situations like global warming and the disaster that the president doesn't believe will occur will just continue to spiral out of control because they don't believe nearly irrefutable evidence. I really hope Democrats get out the vote in this next election, or that the Republicans have someone running who hasn't blinded themselves.
I don't remember it being like this when I was a kid. When did it become popular in America to be so blindly religious and then try and run a country?
[Debate evolves into religious discussion]
A school in Florida wants a children's book about Cuba banned because it doesn't recount the horrors of dictatorship and communism. Call me crazy, but would they rather their children actually read about that?
I get discouraged every time they talk about banning a book, it makes me wonder how things like that are even legal in this country. And every time something like this happens it just makes the action more acceptable. I'm beginning to think that eventually they just simply won't read in schools because idiot parents complain about every book that is being read. And honestly, with the things that happen in this world, and the poor job so many parents do at controlling their kids it stuns me that people would go this far. When the whole world becomes censored and subject to the whims of (overcompensating) parents, will we just stop educating completely? Every time a book is censored I see kids getting more stupid and ignorant.
~Nikki